On 6/22/2020 1:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 6/22/20 3:50 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I can do that without objection
> 
> I can save everyone time by saying that I will object.

There's a weird, edge-case, legal precedent (that I won't bother to look
for, it just rings a bell) that discussion fora are actually *less*
communicative than non-fora.

The argument is specific for cases where something is done by
"informing/submitting to the [officer]" (e.g. Cantus Cygneus).  The idea
being that in the DF, it's a general open optional forum with no
expectation that an officer see what's posted there, even if e posts there
regularly (I mean, I regularly skim/skip stuff here - we all do).  But if
you meet the officer in a random place online and tell em, it could create
the assumption/evidence more strongly that e'd been "informed", especially
if the medium supports directed saved personal messaging and so forth.

-G.

            • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
            • ... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
            • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
            • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
          • Re: ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
            • ... James Cook via agora-discussion
          • Re: ... nch via agora-discussion
            • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
            • ... nch via agora-discussion
            • ... Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
    • Re: DIS: Re: BUS... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
  • Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Put... Edward Murphy via agora-discussion

Reply via email to