On 6/28/2020 8:35 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:29 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 6/28/20 11:06 PM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote: >>> So, as it currently stands, the Referee can impose 6 blots around >> anywhere >>> e wants for no reason whatsoever, just because e feels like it. This >> seems, >>> to put it mildly, unfair (the PM can also do this but e is a special boi, >>> so this is fine). I create the following proposal and pay 1 legislative >>> product to pend it. >>> >>> Title: Only the PM can be arbitrary! >>> AI: 1.7 >>> Coauthor Aris >>> Text: Repeal Rule 2479/6 "Official Injustice" >> >> >> I think a judge found that it's impossible to amend a specific rule >> revision, so it's likely to be impossible to repeal it, too. > > > Depending on the judge's reasoning, that doesn't necessarily follow. If you > amend a revision, it isn't the same revision anymore. It's like trying to > change a git commit. That (arguably) doesn't even make sense as an > operation. By contrast, repealing a revision simply means making it not be > a rule anymore. It (arguably) works so long as that revision is the > revision currently in effect.
*obviously* repealing a revision is actually a rollback and the revision before that goes back into effect. :p
