[It would be nice to have an up-to-date players list...] I assign CFJ 3407 to scshunt:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following: omd assigned CFJ 3406 using a process > that, over time, would allow all interested players have a reasonably > equal opportunity to judge. > > I bar omd. > > Arguments. > > The clause at issue is the last sentence of R991. omd has not > explicitly stated how e chooses judges, or how e's tracking > "interested players". I wondered, when I wrote that part of R991, > whether a breach of this rule (if it happened) could even be > detected, so this seems like as good a test case for the burden > of proof on that clause as any.
