[Arbitor's note: scshunt informally favored this case. Good enough for me while I get a system sorted].
======================================================================== DOCKET CARD CFJ: 3407 Statement: Rule 2426 (Cards) exists. Caller: Tiger Called on: 4 Jun 2014 19:32:17 GMT Judge: scshunt Gratuitous arguments by omd: However, on review, I'm not sure Rule 2426 (Cards) actually exists: it's clearly a mechanism for judicial determinations, yet has no way for a person to cause formal reconsideration of them, so its enactment was perhaps prevented by Rule 217, last para. Gratuitous arguments by G.: Just a historical note, on a couple occasions when the judicial system broke down and left an obvious forced injustice, the injured party was made whole via a proposal. A person can always "formally" submit a proposal calling for eir exoneration (unless the punishment forbids proposal-making), which would essentially be the same voters as a formal Moot. Though I don't know if this is actually "reconsideration". ========================================================================= -G. [H. former Arbitor omd, any other tasks outstanding? Also, can you describe the scrapeable format you prefer?]
