RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9144-9177
=================================
ID Title Result
---------------------------------------
9144 Sortition, again ADOPTED
9145 Pragmatic quarters REJECTED
9146 The Agorans Are Talking ADOPTED
9147 Paradox cleanup fix ADOPTED
I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.
The quorum for all below decisions was 3.
VOTING STRENGTHS
================
Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
#: player has voting strength 3
$: player has voting strength 4
%: player has voting strength 5
^: player has voting strength 6
PROPOSALS
=========
PROPOSAL 9144 (Sortition, again)
AUTHOR: Janet
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (5): Janet^, Mischief%, Murphy%, ais523%, snail^
AGAINST (0):
PRESENT (0):
BALLOTS: 5
AI (F/A): 27/0 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: 1.000
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
PROPOSAL 9145 (Pragmatic quarters)
AUTHOR: Murphy
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (1): Murphy%
AGAINST (4): Janet^, Mischief%, ais523%, snail^
PRESENT (0):
BALLOTS: 5
AI (F/A): 5/22 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: -0.600
OUTCOME: REJECTED
PROPOSAL 9146 (The Agorans Are Talking)
AUTHOR: Janet
CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
FOR (3): Mischief, Murphy, snail
AGAINST (0):
PRESENT (2): Janet, ais523
BALLOTS: 5
AI (F/A): 9/0 (AI=3.0)
POPULARITY: 0.600
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
PROPOSAL 9147 (Paradox cleanup fix)
AUTHOR: ais523
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (5): Janet^, Mischief%, Murphy%, ais523%, snail^
AGAINST (0):
PRESENT (0):
BALLOTS: 5
AI (F/A): 27/0 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: 1.000
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9144
Title: Sortition, again
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: Janet
Co-authors:
If at least one of the following conditions would be met prior to the
amendment, amend Rule 2691 ("Sortition Procedure") by, as a single
amendment:
* If the Rule contains a paragraph beginning "At the beginning of each
quarter", replacing that paragraph with the following paragraphs:
{
A player CAN by announcement initiate a sortition for a vacant
sortitioned office for which a sortition is not ongoing. At the
beginning of each quarter, for each sortitioned office for which a
sortition is not ongoing, the ADoP CAN once by announcement, and SHALL
in a timely fashion, initiate a sortition.
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a sortition CANNOT be initiated
for an office for which a sortition is ongoing.
}
* If the Rule does not contain a single paragraph beginning "If a
sortition is ever ongoing", appending the following paragraph:
{
If a sortition is ever ongoing for a non-sortitioned office (or for an
office that no longer exists), that sortition immediately ends.
}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9146
Title: The Agorans Are Talking
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Janet
Co-authors:
The publicity of the forum that can be sent to at the email address
agora-talk@agora.nomic.space is hereby flipped to Discussion.
[In light of omd saying e would prefer someone else to take over
maintenance of the lists, in addition to what appears to be a current
list outage, let's at least start trying a mailing list that is hosted
by someone else.]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9147
Title: Paradox cleanup fix
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: ais523
Co-authors:
Add a new paragraph to the end of rule 991:
{{{
If two CFJs become assigned to the same judge in the same
message, those CFJs are "linked" to each other, unless that
message specifies that the CFJs should not be linked. The
Arbitor SHOULD consider linking two CFJs if they inquire about
the same or substantially similar events and are called at
approximately the same time.
}}}
Amend the first paragraph of rule 2553 to read:
{{{
If a CFJ about the effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a
change in the gamestate has been assigned a judgement of
PARADOXICAL continuously for between 7 and 90 days, then that
case's initiator, CAN, by announcement, Transcend Logic,
specifying that CFJ, provided that e has not already won the game
with respect to that CFJ or to a CFJ linked to it. When a person
transcends logic, e wins the game.
}}}
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
