=================
PROMOTOR'S REPORT
=================
I initiate a referendum on each of the following proposals, removing
them from the proposal pool. For each referendum the vote collector is the
Assessor, the quorum is 7, the adoption index is that of the associated
proposal, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR
and AGAINST. (PRESENT and conditional votes are also both valid votes.)
ID Author AI Name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
9367* qenya 3.0 Divestment
9368~ Galle 1.0 Greater Genetic Mutation v3
9369* snail+ 3.0 Oops
9370~ Galle 2.0 Probably shouldn't leave this lying around
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal pool contains the following proposals (self-ratifying):
Author AI Name
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Legend:
NNNN*: Democratic proposal
NNNN~: Ordinary proposal
NAME+: Coauthors listed below
The full text of all above mentioned proposals is listed below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
==========
ID 9367
Divestment (AI=3.0)
author: qenya
coauthors:
Set the Indigo Ribbon Ownership of the author of this proposal to False.
[Many, many years ago, I acquired an Indigo Ribbon through a scam,
without realising this was considered Poor Form, and later used it in a
Win by Renaissance. Since then I have desperately been trying to
account for it by achieving degrees and declining to award myself the
ribbon, but people keep "helpfully" awarding it to me anyway to allow
for my "forgetfulness".
This just happened again and I do not want to go through yet another
round of this. Can we fix it by proposal, please?]
==========
ID 9368
Greater Genetic Mutation v3 (AI=1.0)
author: Galle
coauthors:
Amend Rule 2710 ("Genetic Modification") by replacing the fourth
paragraph with the following text:
---
Once per Crop Season, the Land Managor CAN and SHALL by announcement set
a randomly selected attribute (Seed Cost, Growth Duration, Opportunity,
Resilience, or Sell Price) of a randomly selected type of Crop that was
in-season during the previous season to a randomly selected valid value.
If there is no such type to select, then e SHALL instead announce that fact.
==========
ID 9369
Oops (AI=3.0)
author: snail
coauthors: Mischief
Amend Rule 2713 (Scoring Numbers) by replacing the text:
{
Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the
Numerator CAN once, and SHALL in a timely fashion, grant that
player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a
proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a
referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in
that number, whose type is that digit.
}
with the text:
{
Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the
Numerator CAN once by announcement, and SHALL in a timely fashion,
grant that
player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a
proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a
referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in
that number, whose type is that digit.
}
The following statement is hereby ratified:
{
Each attempt to grant a player a number card that occured prior to the
adoption of this proposal took effect as if the text "CAN once," in Rule
2713 instead read "CAN once by announcement,".
}
[This should work for each version of Rule 2713 that has existed. I'm doing
this instead of changing the past text of the rule because doing that
retroactively would have caused proposals that amended that specific text
to fail.]
[I also considered expunging the Numerator's duties to avoid shenanigans,
but that might do more harm than good, and the ratification should already
cover that issue.]
==========
ID 9370
Probably shouldn't leave this lying around (AI=2.0)
author: Galle
coauthors:
Repeal the rule entitled "Purchased Re-enactment".
--
Cosmo
Promotor, Illuminator
