>From the peanut gallery, I don't think ratification is the right approach here. Creation of a legal fiction would be better.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 14:03, Aris Merchant < [email protected]> wrote: > I intend to ratify without objection the following ~~~-delimited > document (see further the notes at the bottom of this message): > ~~~ > Effective date: Dec 14 00:15:01 UTC 2019 > > At Dec 14 00:15:00 UTC 2019, the fora agora-official and > agora-business became discussion fora. > ~~~ > > I intend to ratify without objection the following ~~~-delimited > document (see further the notes at the bottom of this message): > ~~~ > Effective date: Dec 28 01:45:01 UTC 2019 > > At Dec 28 01:45:00 UTC 2019, the fora agora-official and > agora-business became public fora. > ~~~ > > I pledge not to ratify either of those documents without ratifying the > other one. I note that the documents above are technically incorrect, > but that ratifying them would reduce ambiguity about what messages > failed to be public under CFJ 1905. > > -Aris > _______________________________________________ > Agora mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora >
_______________________________________________ Agora mailing list [email protected] https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
