Why?

-Aris

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 1:48 PM Alexis Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:

> From the peanut gallery, I don't think ratification is the right approach
> here. Creation of a legal fiction would be better.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 14:03, Aris Merchant <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I intend to ratify without objection the following ~~~-delimited
>> document (see further the notes at the bottom of this message):
>> ~~~
>> Effective date: Dec 14 00:15:01 UTC 2019
>>
>> At Dec 14 00:15:00 UTC 2019, the fora agora-official and
>> agora-business became discussion fora.
>> ~~~
>>
>> I intend to ratify without objection the following ~~~-delimited
>> document (see further the notes at the bottom of this message):
>> ~~~
>> Effective date: Dec 28 01:45:01 UTC 2019
>>
>> At Dec 28 01:45:00 UTC 2019, the fora agora-official and
>> agora-business became public fora.
>> ~~~
>>
>> I pledge not to ratify either of those documents without ratifying the
>> other one. I note that the documents above are technically incorrect,
>> but that ratifying them would reduce ambiguity about what messages
>> failed to be public under CFJ 1905.
>>
>> -Aris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Agora mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Agora mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora

Reply via email to