On 10/21/2020 12:59 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> AGAINST: This proposal is malformed and unclear on what is being replaced.

I change my vote on proposal 8512 to AGAINST.

From R105:
      Any ambiguity in the specification of a rule change causes that
      change to be void and without effect.

This has been interpreted very strictly, for example saying that including
a revision number in a rule change is enough to invalidate it, even if
it's abundantly clear in terms of intent what rule is being referred to.

_______________________________________________
Agora mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora

Reply via email to