On 10/25/20 3:27 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I had in mind that changing a Victoria-modified vote acts as a trigger
> for the changer to be subject to some crazy punishment, like becoming
> a super-zombie to the person you tried to screw. We can keep people
> stuck in the contract anyways until a condition is fulfilled, and
> contracts have quite a lot of power to puppeteer other people, so very
> likely something can be done there that serves as a strong way to
> enforce things against cheeky people. I'd rather avoid Pledges because
> Pledges aren't as mechanically strong as forcefully making transfers
> or puppeteering people directly.


You can cause a violator to grant emself blots (or use AAA ;) ).
Self-enforcing contracts was the main reason for adding that feature.

-- 
Jason Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor

_______________________________________________
Agora mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora

Reply via email to