Hi. Speaking as a huge starwars fan, i don't think a saber should be able to block all weapons. technical a jedi tends to use the force to throw stuff away from them and only uses the saber to bounce back energy blasts like the blaster or the thunderbolt. sorry if this is too geeky, but it just strikes me that using the saber to block evrything to the point of not getting hit by rockets and misiles makes it fairly hard to actually kill some one with a saber in motion so that you have to attack them directly with a saber. Have you considered implimenting some force powers, perhaps a force shield, a saber throw or a force lightning? i'd be very happy to provide the sounds. Other than that though a great mod, where did ya get the sounds from out of interest, the phantom menace for pc?
Cheers
Edd.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Guitar Babe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "AGRIP User and Developer discussion list" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: [AGRIP-discuss] Light Saber Mod


Agreed, right now there is only one bug which only happens when one types reconnect in the console, which I will be working on in the next day or so, and aside from that it works fine. I've taken care of everything else. There is however, one thing I'd love feedback on, from those who have tried it, and just in general from anyone, and that is the way I have the saber working as a shield. At present, I have the takedamage field being changed when the saber is swung, so it doesn't matter which direction one is facing, an attack will be blocked as the saber is swung, and then the field will be reset back to normal. I've since thought of a fairly simple way that the protection one gets from the saber could be made directional, I.E. only in front of the player, which would make sense in regard to where the saber is being held and swung.

I'm curious what people think is appropriate. The reason I haven't changed it already, is that I kind of think it balances out the weapon, in that one really needs to get very close to an enemy and the bit of extra protection that's given this way, is to me at least, right in line with the films, as the Jedi were pretty difficult adversaries which was the point. And this makes it in a way more interesting in that it might be more appropriate to engage someone with a light saber, with a light saber, rather than another weapon. Does this make sense?

Anyway, I'd love feedback on this so I can code it if necessary.
  Thanks so much and have a wonderful day!...

Smiles,

GG

At 02:40 PM 5/7/2006 +0100, you wrote:

My personal view would be get the bugs fixed so that you've got some
thing even more solid to build new features on -- I really am looking
forward to tyring this as soon as I can get the new ZQuake engine
working AGRIP-style again... :-).

bye just now,


--
Matthew T. Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
AGRIP-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agrip.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agrip-discuss



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: 5/8/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/334 - Release Date: 5/8/2006


_______________________________________________
AGRIP-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agrip.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agrip-discuss
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]



_______________________________________________
AGRIP-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agrip.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agrip-discuss

Reply via email to