Hello Gregoire, and list,

I'd guess that, although you may be seeing some spatial structure in your 
data, the effective range of your model may be less than the minimum distance 
between the locations you are predicting and their closest known locations. 
In other words, your model may effectively be a 'pure nugget', even though 
technically it is not.

One check on how much kriging is improving predictions is to see how much 
better cross validated kriging predictions do than a simple unweighted mean 
for each location.

>From memory (and therefore very unreliable!) I seem to recall that radon is 
generally very spatially noisy across relatively small geographic areas, so 
spatial interpolation may simply not be a very effective technique, at least 
without additional variables.

Yours,

Ashton


> > I thought about that (the nugget effect) but my variogram (and robust
> > variograms) did show a short scale structure (with a high nugget
> > effect).
> >
> > Considering the possibility you mention, that I actually have a
> > phenomenon with a pure nugget effect although I see a structure, what do
> > I have to trust? My experimental variogram showing a structure or the
> > strong slope of my residuals (either + or -1 depending on the way you
> > define the residuals) plotted against the observed data telling me that
> > I actually may not have a structure? The correlation between my observed
> > and estimate values is poor indeed (0.40) but still..
> >
> > For what concerns the definition of the residuals, Surfer and Isatis
> > used here defined the  residuals = estimate - observed. I haven't
> > checked the other software.
> >
> > I had a quick look in Isaaks & Srivastava, Deutsch & Journel, Chiles and
> > Delfiner... all use the same definition as above (i.e. residuals =
> > estimate - observed).
> >
> > Many thanks again for your kind  feedback!
> >
> > Gregoire
> >
> > __________________________________________
> > Gregoire Dubois (Ph.D.)
> >
> > European Commission (EC)
> > Joint Research Centre (DG JRC)
> > WWW: http://rem.jrc.cec.eu.int/
> >
> > "The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any
> > circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the
> > European Commission."
> >
> >

-- 
Ashton Shortridge
Associate Professor                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept of Geography                       http://www.msu.edu/~ashton
235 Geography Building                  ph (517) 432-3561
Michigan State University               fx (517) 432-1671

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to [email protected]
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.it with no subject and 
"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/

Reply via email to