-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm also +1 for slf4j.
Marlon On 9/3/11 1:46 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: > Hi Patnachai, > > I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of > using log4j with commons-logging wrapper. > > > There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove > them too ! > > Lahiru > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> Hello devs, >> >> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I >> think we should unify our logging library in the project. Right >> now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j, > > and slf4j in both >> build files (pom.xml) and source codes. >> >> Personally, I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained >> and it also compatible with others (just drop a jar file to a >> classpath). >> >> -- Best Regards, Patanachai Tangchaisin >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYmhuAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5WigH/jXXRQTczdoflVzKQIMhyHL9 ZiJaGJ0ijFCJdCisAol/eTLE8hwgFgmTxdKlG5ca1QX8skIOWKSHK7Ik76iM4/9D uA5yQmEZpc8t6opSMdiC2SlkUXa6NAcJWKHX7SLDll8cY9pHiXX26D1QbC7MFFtm I4HBeVqMGHWKM+sSuID3MVmHJ1IPjwRw0JoI6HBwYX3EBsWBeh+DkjZdRPklVtAT kp1fAGJ6RcwlQeb9bS3hclcHayn7UnUOljvZ2iNUOLv4Wk7foFfDzTdxbo9nOIyG GfMsmzBzeEMlOL2R9aXzxCshY5szvYPzxg5ABOy+h/fav6QD3YhWCjSwv23WrRQ= =QRLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
