+! for sl4j as well. Unless we see any negative votes, I suggest we put JIRA tickets for all components to change to a single logger and cleanup any logging and sysouts.
Suresh On Sep 3, 2011, at 9:14 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi wrote: > Since the slf4j license [1] is also compatible with Apache license, here's > my +1. > > [1] - http://www.slf4j.org/license.html > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Marlon Pierce <[email protected]>wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'm also +1 for slf4j. >> >> >> Marlon >> >> >> On 9/3/11 1:46 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: >>> Hi Patnachai, >>> >>> I am +1 for slf4j because I consider is as a improved version of >>> using log4j with commons-logging wrapper. >>> >>> >>> There are some Xsul logging implemented in Xbaya we need to remove >>> them too ! >>> >>> Lahiru >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, [email protected] >>> <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello devs, >>>> >>>> After browsing through dependencies in the project for a while, I >>>> think we should unify our logging library in the project. Right >>>> now, we have used Apache-common-logging, Log4j, >>> >>> and slf4j in both >>>> build files (pom.xml) and source codes. >>>> >>>> Personally, I would go with SLF4J since it is actively maintained >>>> and it also compatible with others (just drop a jar file to a >>>> classpath). >>>> >>>> -- Best Regards, Patanachai Tangchaisin >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOYmhuAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5WigH/jXXRQTczdoflVzKQIMhyHL9 >> ZiJaGJ0ijFCJdCisAol/eTLE8hwgFgmTxdKlG5ca1QX8skIOWKSHK7Ik76iM4/9D >> uA5yQmEZpc8t6opSMdiC2SlkUXa6NAcJWKHX7SLDll8cY9pHiXX26D1QbC7MFFtm >> I4HBeVqMGHWKM+sSuID3MVmHJ1IPjwRw0JoI6HBwYX3EBsWBeh+DkjZdRPklVtAT >> kp1fAGJ6RcwlQeb9bS3hclcHayn7UnUOljvZ2iNUOLv4Wk7foFfDzTdxbo9nOIyG >> GfMsmzBzeEMlOL2R9aXzxCshY5szvYPzxg5ABOy+h/fav6QD3YhWCjSwv23WrRQ= >> =QRLd >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Heshan Suriyaarachchi > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
