On Apr 29, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > I think the NOTICE file for the binary distribution still can, and > should, get a bit more cleaned up. > There definitely still are notices which IMO need to be checked for if > the really are needed. > As I mentioned in my earlier feedback, all should be properly > reviewed, at least more than just the *examples* I pointed out... > > However, I don't regard these as blocking issues, nor did I see new ones. > So I'll vote +1 :)
Hi Ate, Thank you very much for taking time to review and Vote. I tried to go through all the notices, but surely agree that the job is still not complete. Will keep this as an ongoing task and high priority one and I hope we can get the Notice all cleansed up within the next release or two. Suresh > > Regards, Ate > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org> wrote: >> Discussion thread for vote on airavata 0.2-incubating release candidate 6. >> >> If you have any questions or feedback or to post results of validating the >> release, please reply to this thread. Once you verify the release, please >> post your vote to the VOTE thread. >> >> For reference, the Apache release guide - >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> Incubator specific release guidelines - >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> >> Some tips to validate the release before you vote: >> >> * Download the binary version and run the 5 minute or 10 minute tutorial as >> described in README and website. >> * Download the source files from compressed files and release tag and build >> (which includes tests). >> * Verify the distributon for the required LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER >> files >> * Verify if all the staged files are signed and the signature is verifiable. >> * Verify if the signing key in the project's KEYS file is hosted on a public >> server >> >> Thanks for your time in validating the release and voting, >> Suresh
