From: "Greg Menzies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Could not agree more was just defending the requirements as per private prac
and the law.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hook, Trevor
Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2003 4:03 PM
To: 'AIRNEWS'
Subject: RE: [AIRNEWS] FILM FILING


 From: "Hook, Trevor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ancient Chinese saying....'One picture is worth ten thousand words.'
Given
that humans the reporting, I would rather know the real evidence
remains
available for a reasonable time.

Trevor Hook
Deputy Chief Medical Imaging Technologist
Radiology Department
Division of Imaging Services
Ph (08) 9224 2919
Fax (08) 9224 2912


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Scas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Sent:   Wednesday, 2 April 2003 14:17
                To:     AIRNEWS
                Subject:        Re: [AIRNEWS] FILM FILING

                 From: "Scas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

                SPOT ON GREG. SO WHY ARE WE REQUIRED TO
DO IT?? SCAS
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: "Greg Menzies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                To: "AIRNEWS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:43 AM
                Subject: RE: [AIRNEWS] FILM FILING


                > From: "Greg Menzies"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                >
                > Is not the obligation to keep the report? the films are
a
means to that
                > report as are path samples.
                >
                > Greg M
                >
                > -----Original Message-----
                > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Scas
                > Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2003 9:44 AM
                > To: AIRNEWS
                > Subject: Re: [AIRNEWS] FILM FILING
                >
                >
                >  From: "Scas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                >
                > IF THE OBLIGATION TO ARCHIVE FILMS IS LAW,
WHY DOES IT
                > SEEM TO APPLY ONLY IN
                > THE PUBLIC SECTOR? THE PRIVATE SECTOR
SYSTEM OF
                > ISSUING THE FILMS TO THE
                > PATIENT IS MUCH MORE COST EFFECTIVE.
                > SCAS.
                > ----- Original Message -----
                > From: "John Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:27 PM
                > Subject: Re: [AIRNEWS] FILM FILING
                >
                >
                > > From: "John Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                > >
                > > Scas,
                > > I can't help you with NSW Regs. and I think it
varies
from State to
                State.
                > > In ACT it is regulated under the Archives Act.
While
there, in an
                attempt
                > to
                > > reduce the requirement, I put the argument that
films
are working
                > documents
                > > and the report is the permanent record. This was
NOT
accepted.
                > > The question will change in a PACS environment.
The
question of how long
                > > will remain but additional considerations will be how
much (all CT
                slices
                > or
                > > a selection, raw data), with losless or lossy
compression.
                > > Can I pose a second part to your question. Are
there any
regulations for
                a
                > > PACS environment in any jurisdiction.
                > > John Ryan
                > > >
                > > >
                > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/29/03 10:27am
>>>
                > > >  From: "Scas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                > > >
                > > >
                > > >JUST WHAT ARE THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR RETENTION OF
X-
                > > RAYFILMS
                > > >IN N.S.W. PUBLIC HOSPITALS? MANY FILMS
LEAVE HOSPITALS
(SOME
                > > >UNREPORTED) FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS
AND MANY NEVER
RETURN. IS
                > > >THERE ANY REASON THAT WE CANNOT
ADOPT THE MORE COST
EFFECTIVE
                > > >SYSTEM USED IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR OF
ISSUING THE FILMS
INTO THE
                > > >CARE OF THE PATIENT (PERHAPS VIA THE
REFERER)?
                > > >IS ANYONE OUT THERE DOING THIS
ALREADY?
                > > >SCAS
                > >
                > >
                > >
                > >  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
                > >  This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
                > >  the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server
                > >
                > >  Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > >  For assistance send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > >  Commands should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                > >
                > > Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily
those of the
                > > moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.
                > >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
                >  This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
                >  the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server
                >
                >  Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >  For assistance send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >  Commands should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >
                > Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily
those
of the
                > moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
                >  This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
                >  the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server
                >
                >  Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >  For assistance send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >  Commands should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                >
                > Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily
those
of the
                > moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.
                >




                 +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
                 This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
                 the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server

                 Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                 For assistance send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                 Commands should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

                Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily
those of
the
                moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.



 +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
 This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
 the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server

 Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For assistance send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Commands should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily those of the
moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.




 +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
 This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
 the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server

 Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For assistance send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Commands should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily those of the
moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.

Reply via email to