From: Michael Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Peter,
I can't speak for what goes on in the examination room but I played a hand in setting up the appointment software for Hunter Imaging in Newcastle and as a result of the HIC rulings, in particular reference to MSK US, we made sure that whenever one of these US were booked then the appropriate amount of the drs time was also booked. As far as I was aware the drs did actually see every patient that was booked under their name. I haven't worked there for a few years now but the software is still in use and I'm sure the process is the same. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Game" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <undisclosed-recipients:> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: [AIRNEWS] Ultrasound radiologist attendance. > From: Peter Game <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi all, > It seems to be a pet desire of the HIC to have ultrasound examinations > performed only where there is a radiologist on site, to provide > 'personal supervision' of the sonographer. The Federal Health Dept > doesn't agree (I thought they were on the same team!). I have heard > arguments from prominent radiologists from the RACR in support of this > proposition, but with most radiologists being now employed by large > corporations there is the possibility that the opinions of the > 'college' are being somewhat coloured. Also it has been my experience > that a radiologist personally examining an ultrasound patient is the > exception rather than the rule. Given that background, I am keen to > gather any anecdotal evidence from sonographers relating to current > practices in radiology centres where there are fulltime radiologists. > The sort of information I would like is: 1. Where there is a > sonographer performing the exam, what percentage of patients are > personally examined by a radiologist? 2. Of those patients personally > examined, what percentage are examined because the radiologist feels > they need to for diagnosis, as opposed to wanting to because they have > a particular interest in ultrasound? 3. In those cases where the > radiologist personally examined a patient, in what percentage were the > sonographer's findings changed? 4. Since personal attendance for > musculoskeletal ultrasound was introduced, what percentage of > radiologists personally examine the patient themselves? > > I'm certainly not interested in naming names or getting specific > information about specific groups or radiologists, just a general > overview. If the results are as interesting as I suspect they might > be, I will then try to organise a formal survey to be undertaken for > the information of the HIC and Health Dept. > > Meanwhile if anyone would like to share some anecdotal percentages, > please email me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] - all contributions > received will remain strictly confidential. Thanks in advance > > Peter Game +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS, the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For assistance send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commands should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily those of the moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.
