mmm, I see. I'm torn between the two; they seem equivalent to me. Probably comes down to a matter of preference.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:01 AM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:26 AM Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hence this proposal: >> > static Dirtab mystuff[] __vartab = { >> > {"boot", {(uint64_t)&boot, 0, 0}, 0, 0555, "%x",}, >> > }; >> >> I don't see how this let's you split the declaration of variables >> across files (as Davide's Macros does). It looks to me like you would >> have to edit the table in a single file for any variables you wanted >> to include in it. >> >> > > > this could be in any file. That's the point of the __vartab tag. It's the > standard "gather it up at link time" technique. You can have these pretty > much anywhere and they'll all show up when you > ls '#vars' > > > It's a good deal simpler than the other things seen. > > ron > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Akaros" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- ~Kevin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
