On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:05 AM Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote:
> mmm, I see. I'm torn between the two; they seem equivalent to me. > Probably comes down to a matter of preference. > > They're basically equivalent with one major difference: my proposal fits in with the convention of a fixed inter-component interface based on Dev structs, building on our current model; as does Barrett's. I'd prefer it if we could stick to this model. I'm a bit uncomfortable with the (to me) complex macros of the other approach, much less the fact that it introduces a new special-purpose struct and interface. It widens the interfaces and I'd rather we not do that. Just my $.002 (discounted opinion rate applies). ron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
