We have that, it's spelled:
if (x < y && !foo) error(EBADMSG);
:-)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, 'Davide Libenzi' via Akaros <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I have found it useful, in the code I am writing, to have an assert which
> throws an error(), instead of a panic() (which is a bit extreme).
>
> ERROR_ASSERT(EBADMSG, x < y && !foo);
>
> I am looking at the assert.h file, and all the macros there (likely to
> follow the historical assert() naming convention) use lowercase.
> One of the very few coding style rules I am passionate of (and which has
> been followed pretty much by every project I worked on), is uppercase for
> macros (a sort of "thread carefully" warning to the developer).
> Any very good reason why it should be lowercase?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Akaros" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Akaros" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
