Yes, it's a Linux perf record injected. Plus, we would need something, if we plan to implement uname.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Barret Rhoden <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-12-14 at 14:18 "'Davide Libenzi' via Akaros" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Currently the knowledge of the Linux perf file format is kept at a > > minimum. Injecting that information at Linux side would require > > heavier changes to the Linux perf tool, which I intentionally kept at > > a minimum, to minimize conflicts in applying to new versions. > > Similarly, if I have to crack open the perf file at Linux side, we > > will have to have another tools on the Linux side. > > Makes sense. So it sounds like there is a perf record or something > with the kernel binary location? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Akaros" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
