To be more specific , will this change be available in 2.3.x codeline.
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:23:31 PM UTC-7, Mohnish Kodnani wrote: > > Has this been released ? > > > On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 12:27:36 PM UTC-7, Tyler C wrote: >> >> Awesome, thanks for the positive responses! >> >> Just for the benefit of providing breadcrumbs, here's the ticket I >> created on Patrik's advice (you've probably seen it already). >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/akka/tickets/3970 >> >> Tyler >> >> >> On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 12:18:22 PM UTC-7, rkuhn wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tyler, >>> >>> 29 mar 2014 kl. 19:35 skrev Tyler C <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I just experienced this issue myself. It seems to me that there could be >>> value in allowing the implementer of the FSM to decide which transitions >>> are valuable and which are not. Akka does provide the distinction between >>> goto(state) and stay() -- couldn't the first imply a transition where the >>> second does not? Back in my college automata course, we implemented plenty >>> of state machines with same-state transitions that were significant >>> (consuming messages in the process): regular expressions like */(a)*b/* >>> being a perfect example. >>> >>> My work-around has been to implement two identical states that simply >>> bounce between each other. While workable it looks quite clumsy, as in this >>> FizzBuzz example: https://gist.github.com/JavadocMD/9859519 >>> >>> Is there any chance the Akka team could reconsider this implementation >>> or are there compelling reasons to leave it as-is? >>> >>> >>> The reason was mostly that the FSM did what I needed at the time ;-) >>> What you propose makes sense, especially using goto(sameState) (which >>> should currently be unused) would be a good way to encode this. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Roland >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tyler >>> >>> >>> On Monday, March 17, 2014 2:09:50 PM UTC-7, Patrik Nordwall wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:43 PM, brett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> I have a finite state machine modelled in Akka FSM that in certain >>>>> circumstance transitions back to the same state after updating some >>>>> values. >>>>> >>>>> I have found that the onTransition handler is called when i transition >>>>> from one different state to another (e.g. A to B) but this handler is >>>>> not >>>>> called when I transition from the same state (e.g. A to A). >>>>> >>>>> Is this expected behaviour of the Akka FSM? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, that is expected. Staying in the same state is not a state >>>> transition. >>>> Cheers, >>>> Patrik >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> >>>>> Brett >>>>> >>>>> p.s. I originally posted this question over on the play framework user >>>>> list but i have been advised to post it here so apologise to those of you >>>>> who see this question twice in your inbox. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: >>>>> https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Akka User List" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Patrik Nordwall >>>> Typesafe <http://typesafe.com/> - Reactive apps on the JVM >>>> Twitter: @patriknw >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>> >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>> >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: >>> https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Akka User List" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Dr. Roland Kuhn* >>> *Akka Tech Lead* >>> Typesafe <http://typesafe.com/> – Reactive apps on the JVM. >>> twitter: @rolandkuhn >>> <http://twitter.com/#!/rolandkuhn> >>> >>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
