I just tried the following (on 2.0-M1):
scala> Source(1 to 100).map{i ⇒ println(i);
i}.grouped(10).runWith(Sink.head)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
res10: scala.concurrent.Future[scala.collection.immutable.Seq[Int]] =
scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise@2df79942
12
13
14
15
16
scala> 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
res10.onComplete(println)
Success(Vector(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10))
A similar behavior can be seen for the take function:
scala> Source(1 to 100).map{i ⇒ println(i);
i}.take(10).runWith(Sink.fold(Vector[Int]())(_ :+ _))
...
As one can see, the stream processes more elements than it has to. It is
not a problem for me, but I would like to know if this behavior is spec'ed
anywhere? Shouldn't the stream be able to say, just by looking at the
arguments for grouped, take and the sink, how many elements should be
produced?
--
>>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ:
>>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html
>>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka
User List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/akka-user.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
