On 03/12/2007 08:29 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Yes, now AC can compute cycle index series of simple graphs up to order
>> 6. [...] And believe it or not AC is now more correct than my version of
>> BLL. There is an obvious typo in Z_{Graph}. They give a term
>>
>> 64/9 x_1^3 x_2
>>
>> for in the "degree 6" polynomial. AC computes x_3 instead of x_2.
>
> cute. Well, Hornegger and Pirastu confirm AC...
Ah, that means you managed to do
)co functori
?
>>> Ja, wenn man bei n=7, i.e., 1044 Graphen mit 7 Knoten aufhört.
>> So that doesn't make me too happy. :-(
> Maybe it is possible to speed things up. Although Hornegger and Pirastu can
> go
> much further, one has to keep in mind that they only implemented the formula,
> and cannot do the general case.
What do you want to say by "cannot do the general case"?
> I think you should stop here, what concerns functorial composition. There are
> too many other interesting projects out there. If you really want to speed
> things up, a profiler would be very nice. It's a pity, Axiom has a wonderful
> profiler, but it only works for spad code. It says:
>
> >> System error:
> |aldorTrace| is invalid as a function.
Christian, do you have some experience with gprof? I don't want you to
do the profiling but rather have someone who shares some experience that
I could learn from.
Ralf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Aldor-combinat-devel mailing list
Aldor-combinat-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aldor-combinat-devel
