Conor MacNeill wrote:
>
> I would like to propose, as perhaps a next step, having Gump run
> any unit tests for each project. Perhaps this could be as simple
> as nominating a unit test target (run-tests for Ant, for example)
> and providing the necessary support jars (junit). In other words,
> while knowing you haven't broken a build is nice, knowing you
> haven't broken functionality is even nicer.
Both gump and alexandria can run tests. I'll add ant's run tests to the
next run, and arrange to have any failures sent automatically to ant-dev.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. I don't want your support jars - I build junit from source every run.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
