Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 8/16/01 12:04 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >>
> >> The dependencies are not detected for you. Geir's little dep engine
> > handles
> >> this nicely. I started with what I thought I needed for the TDK and
> > assumed
> >> the dependencies would be detected but they're not. Not a big deal as I
> > only
> >> have to do this once, but as projects changed it would be nice for these
> > to
> >> be detected so that you don't have to edit your profile when all the
> >> projects change their definitions.
> >
> > Where can I find Geir's little dep engine? Is it something that could be
> > called by gen.java?
>
> I think he put it in the commons ... hmmm it's not there so but it is in the
> commons sandbox along inside jjar. But the dep engine will go into the
> commons utils, that's the plan anyway.
Sure, if it has a general use.
> > In prior discussions with Geir, I got the impression that this was
> > intertwined with the downloading and recursion, but if I could have a
> > shallow set of dependencies provided, that would be great!
>
> I used the little dep engine for the java version and it works great.
This is starting to sound like duplication of what already exists in the
jjar 'stuff', and is leading to a duplication - would it be possible to
simply use jjar to get the dependencies? That way, there would only
one set of dependency descriptors that could be used both for gumping as
well as for general project build and deployment use.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
Well done is better than well said - New England Proverb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
