Hi All,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 3:22 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Should Gump/AntGump/Maven become a separate project?
>
>
> First my thoughts - should Alexandria look like it was going to go into a
> long term hibernation again, I would say yes.
Agreed.
> Otherwise - as long as it
> looks like there is a hope that Alexandria would subsume the functionally
> included by Gump, I would prefer it stay here.
I too would prefer that the functionality stay together, as long as
Alexandria lives. I admit to not looking at Alexandria - my main focus was
to get GUMP working within my own environment. From what little I know of
Alexandria it's a 'library' of JavaDocs(?). Would it be reasonable to
enhance GUMP to generate these too?
> Josh's joining the project rekindles the hope that Alexandria
> will live on.
Definitely - Good luck Josh!
> Follow-on question: Victor has expressed an interest in
> maintaining his own
> project definitions. I'm inclined to put this to a vote, and indicate my
> support.
I'll admit to being unsure about this. Part of me says to competition is
good and part says that cooperation (if possible) is better. Huh, I think
I'm +0 as long as there is one set and only one. If Victor wants to
create/maintain his own I think that GUMP should be capable of using them
and I think Victor ought to remember that GUMP _wants_ to use them and help
make it easy(ish) for us to do so :)
> This is related to the question above as the level of
> granularity
> for karma is at the cvs module level.
What is Sam? Who maintains things?
> Thoughts?
Is GUMP and AntGump growing towards being integrated?
> - Sam Ruby
PS - what is Maven?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
