On 8/29/01 12:15 PM, "josh lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 07:22, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> First my thoughts - should Alexandria look like it was going to go into a
>> long term hibernation again, I would say yes. Otherwise - as long as it
>> looks like there is a hope that Alexandria would subsume the functionally
>> included by Gump, I would prefer it stay here.
>
> Agreed.. Let's keep it here.
>
>>
>> Josh's joining the project rekindles the hope that Alexandria will live on.
>>
>> Follow-on question: Victor has expressed an interest in maintaining his own
>> project defintions. I'm inclined to put this to a vote, and indicate my
>> support. This is related to the question above as the level of granularity
>> for karma is at the cvs module level. Thoughts?
>>
>
> I think that project folk should be able to adjust their descriptors so
> it will just be a matter of figuring out the best way to handle it.
>
One way is the stuff I have been playing with in JJAR - where there is a
central 'directory' that can point to descriptors located in each project's
CVS.
That way the project manages their own descriptor.
Granted, I have just been toying with it. I should have JDOM working that
way for JJAR Real Soon Now, which will be a more substantial test...
Geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
