"Morrison, John" wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, 28 September 2001 2:23 pm > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Build.xml standardization > > > > > > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > > > Update... > > > > > > I really like this. It is pretty much what I envisioned. Enclosed is > > a diff to fine tune it just a little bit. There are two > > classes of changes > > in there: removing duplicate calls of dependant targets, > > OK. I did these just for redundancy sake. My build files all do this and > I've never had a problem with Ant...? > > > and additional comments. > > Thanks. The more comments the better :) > > Now what?
Question regarding the build properties: Do we want to maintain the properties in the "build.properties" file instead of the build.xml file? It would conciderably shorten the beginning of the script. Also, should we standardize on the name of the "build.properties" file included in the distribution? Personally, I think we should only have one there. I like the file name "build.properties" as it compliments the default "build.xml" for the build script. Also, we need to know authoritatively whether "project.name" is created by Ant. If so, we need to use a different property for that. After this, we need to write up the documentation that will be linked to from jakarta's site (a link from the project directory heirarchy page would be nice). We would also provide the skeleton build script and properties file for the user's convenience. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
