On Sat, 9 Feb 2002 01:57, Sam Ruby wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > ... one thing though: Would it be innaproproprate to get gump to depend > > on binaries ? :) > > Gump does depend on binaries. See > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/packages.html > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/cvsjars.html > > Contrary to popular perception, the essence of Gump isn't to depend solely > on cvs. The essense is that while the people who develops a project should > have the FIRST say in what dependencies are used, the person actually > building it on their own machine should have the LAST say.
Kool. Well if you could download a version of saxon from http://users.iclway.co.uk/mhkay/saxon/saxon6.4/saxon.zip and place the jar inside the jar directory with a name of "saxon.jar" then that would be fantastic.. > P.S. Erik Hatcher was also looking into xdoclet and others. I was kinda > holding back to give him an opportunity, but if your project descriptors > work without too much effort, I'll commit them. Damn - you mean I could have avoided work! :) Oh well. Looks like none of them actually worked ... Erik wanna help me try to fix em up ? I will have a bash at cleaning them up now. -- Cheers, Pete -------------------------------------------------- Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence... -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
