[moved to infrastructure@] Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Eric Dobbs wrote: >> > >> > Maybe I'm a little dense. Can you explain a little >> > more? Is Eyebrowse the service that will be brought >> > down by such a test, or Gump? Would you mind >> > explaining how that would work (whichever one it is)? >> >> Gump runs builds. Many builds involve tests. If one of those tests >> involves port 8080, not only may that specific test fail (no biggie), but >> in doing so, it may also bring down the entire servlet running on port >> 8080. > > If port 8080 is used for that, then it definitely suggests that Eyebrowse > there is still experimental. Can we somehow put it on the main port 80 > httpd on nagoya? This could be accomplish via moving Catalina's server port on nagoya to 8000 (or something) and using mod_proxy to forward requests from the port 80 httpd to Catalina. Or, we could use mod_webapp or mod_jk to take a portion of nagoya's httpd URL space. Etc. -- options abound. I'd like to see a cleaner URL space for infrastructure services like this so that we can swap out implementations at will. For instance, http://mail.apache.org/listname/msg would get you to a certain message no matter what implementation was used or which server was hosting the service. I know that mod_rewrite can get hairy, but I think this is a solid long-term approach which trades a little httpd.conf complexity for a great deal of flexibility. Just thinking out loud. - Dan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
