Scott Sanders wrote:
> AntGump didn't have an object model, and I wanted to build one (my own
> itch). It was about the same time as Maven started, but Vindico was
> intended to be more of a continuous build, like tinderbox at Mozilla.
> My intent was that Vindico could actually replace Alexandria as this
> documentation/build haven, but work pressure kind of cut me off at the
> knees WRT to my jakarta work. I do actually intend to get back to
> Vindico, but I do not intend AntGump to live another day.
>
> Perhaps even Vindico should die, since I intended it to be what
> Forrest/Maven/Centipede is now.
Well, not really, since we need something like it in Centipede to catch
the dependencies inside a module, and run targets based on that.
So I guess I'll reuse what you've done :-)
One more question: why is a Java objectmodel much better than a DOM
object model?
It seems that the jenny output can just as well be used as a kind of
objectmodel...
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
