If you want to catch the dependencies inside the model, why not use something like jjar? I was intending on using it internally.
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:50 PM > To: Alexandria Developers List > Subject: Re: Why Antgump stopped and Vindico started? > > > > Scott Sanders wrote: > > AntGump didn't have an object model, and I wanted to build > one (my own > > itch). It was about the same time as Maven started, but > Vindico was > > intended to be more of a continuous build, like tinderbox > at Mozilla. > > My intent was that Vindico could actually replace > Alexandria as this > > documentation/build haven, but work pressure kind of cut me > off at the > > knees WRT to my jakarta work. I do actually intend to get back to > > Vindico, but I do not intend AntGump to live another day. > > > > Perhaps even Vindico should die, since I intended it to be what > > Forrest/Maven/Centipede is now. > > Well, not really, since we need something like it in > Centipede to catch > the dependencies inside a module, and run targets based on that. > > So I guess I'll reuse what you've done :-) > > One more question: why is a Java objectmodel much better than a DOM > object model? > It seems that the jenny output can just as well be used as a kind of > objectmodel... > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:alexandria-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
