Re: Gump, centipede, maven, etc...

[Sam Ruby]

dIon Gillard wrote:

>> I believe that the information that a pure bootstrapping approach
>> provides is quite valuable.
> I agree.

>> I don't know how to get this dones across all of the various
>> codebases, but I am willing to do my part. Are there maven and/or
>> centipede developers out there who share this goal?
> I'm happy to do my part.

dIon, can you take a look at http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-11-24/commons-vfs.html ? This built successfully on 2002-11-20, but failed on 2002-11-21.

It seems that the build.xml is generated, and has a hardcoded path in it that makes no sense on my Linux box. I could override it in the project definition, but that too is generated and in the jakarta-commons/vfs cvs tree.

One solution would be to correct the maven.xml and/or maven itself and check in a corrected build.xml and/or gump.xml.

Another solution would be to ignore the generated gump.xml and construct one by hand that works, perhaps checking it into gump/project directory.

What would you suggest?

- Sam Ruby

P.S. To compound this problem, there was a problem whereby the nag messages were not being sent for this component. This is now fixed.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>