On Jun 8, 2009, at 09:40 , Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote: > Nikodemus Siivola <nikode...@random-state.net> writes: > >> I'm not sure. I'm not totally opposed, but I'm not convinced either: >> even if it wrong, the names are "culturally correct", if you will. >> Names partial-apply and partial-reverse-apply would be my preferred >> ones if we did the renaming. > > I find them too long. Long names can distract from the intent of the > actual code. They're supposed to merely combine domain-level logic, > but > being long they make the impression they're more than that.
FWIW, I agree with Tobias' arguments. I'd vote for PAPPLY (and probably by extension REVPAPPLY) if there is to be a name change. _______________________________________________ alexandria-devel mailing list alexandria-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/alexandria-devel
