Attila Lendvai wrote: > if people second the other opinion, then i feel that i must speak up > on behalf of the non-abbreviation group. > > the need for abbreviation (if any) should be satisfied by a tool (the > editor), not a library.
Indeed, but it's also a matter of screen estate. Composition of three functions partially applied in reverse order might be a one-liner using RCURRY but a whopping three lines using REVERSE-PARTIAL-APPLY. Anyway I feel this discussion is largely based on fancy. How about offering both interfaces? Leslie -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer _______________________________________________ alexandria-devel mailing list alexandria-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/alexandria-devel
