George Graves wrote:
Oh, yes, and this "global Warming" fiasco has severely shaken my
belief in the integrity of the scientific community.
And--if you think that the behavior of the 'scientists' who do the FDA
reauired testing on proposed new drugs--OR the ones who evaluate said
testing are one whit different from the ones who did (and continue to
try to do) the global smarming thing, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you
can buy !!
I'll leave the paleontologists out of it, at least for now.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Richard C. Wagner wrote:
Was anyone else as sickened by this as I was?
Yes. But then, I've been sickened every day for the past 20 years,
so it's become a normal part of waking up.
Closer to 45 years in my case----
Money talks. Citizens walk.
And, if 'they' get their way, a lot of Citizens will DIE.
I'm rapidly becoming convinced that there are 'elites' who are seriously
in search of a way to reduce the world's population by about 80%. And
that the only reason they haven't done it with nukes is because they
know that, in a nuke scenario, that they and their property, not people
of color and the unwashed mases without color, would be among the very
first casualties !
The circumstantial evidence supporting the above statement is all but
overpowering if one looks at the record carefully.
Greg
--
to be removed from alfa, see http://www.digest.net/bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]
