George Boudreau wrote:
Tor Olav Stava wrote:
The preliminary version of my Paco patch for jhahlfs seems to be
ready. IMHO it's a mess, but it works.
Any improvements will be appreciated.
I've run it once with HLFS-Glibc, and it looks to be ok.
It's based on jhalfs-svn (2344)
humm.. it seems you have done your work against the trunk and not
the experimental branch. There is a world of change in the
experimental branch.. have a look. The experimental branch tries to be
modular.
I will see how it looks like in the trunk ..
I've checked out the experimental version, and it looks a lot better :)
I'm a couple days set back, but at least I've learned a lot, so I'll
make it work in the modular approach. Hopefully it will even look
cleaner, than my first attempt.
Just for reference: What's gonna happen to the trunk? I'm wondering if I
should complete the patch for the LFS part, or abandon the trunk
altogether..
And why's there no reference to the experimental version on the ALFS
homepage? I mistakenly thought experimental and development version to
be the same :(
I'll be back in a day or two with the first (modular) patch ;)
Tor Olav
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
