On 3/17/06, Tor Olav Stava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did actually consider it, but it won't help me get rid of that "ugly" > if statement. I need to avoid the first few scripts in chapter06, as > some of them won't create any log for Paco, and thus it will fail trying > to parse a nonexistent logfile.
Well, that one's not so tough. if [ -f "$PACO_TMPFILE" ]; then... This is safer in the long run anyway because you don't have to guarantee that a script produces files before you run it. > It seems I have to do it the way you suggest. Under any circumstance I > can't avoid installing Paco twice. It still needs to be reinstalled > after the toolchain have been readjusted in Ch06 to make it work on the > final system. But, if it makes you feel any better, the build of paco is very short compared to a gcc make bootstrap. > So I'm back for another hack ;) There's always gonna be some hacks. It comes with the territory of boostrapping a system. Tell me if you spot any hacks in the LFS book. :-) (I'll give you a hint: Creating Essential Symlinks, Re-adjusting the Toolchain, ...) -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
