On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:33:59PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote: > El Sábado, 8 de Abril de 2006 19:14, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > > > However, we're now merging this code back into trunk, so I'm wondering > > if it might be less confusing to just continue to refer to it as jhalfs. > > We called it extended because it reached much further than the original > > jhalfs did, but in many ways the new features were just the natural > > progression and next step... > > Well, I'm agnostic about what name is used to refer to it.
Like I said, it is a minor point. I just feel that there isn't really a need to distinguish it from the original code, especially as we've merged it to trunk, and that the -X just adds an extra layer of ambiguity and/or confusion. I'll wait to hear what George (or anyone else that wishes to comment) has to say first. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
