Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 07:33:59PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 8 de Abril de 2006 19:14, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
However, we're now merging this code back into trunk, so I'm wondering
if it might be less confusing to just continue to refer to it as jhalfs.
We called it extended because it reached much further than the original
jhalfs did, but in many ways the new features were just the natural
progression and next step...
Well, I'm agnostic about what name is used to refer to it.
Like I said, it is a minor point. I just feel that there isn't really a
need to distinguish it from the original code, especially as we've
merged it to trunk, and that the -X just adds an extra layer of
ambiguity and/or confusion.
I'll wait to hear what George (or anyone else that wishes to comment)
has to say first.
I have no preference either way, the -X was to separate it from the
mainstream scripts during mailings.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
