El Miércoles, 31 de Mayo de 2006 23:54, George Boudreau escribió: > > This may not be the cleanest method but it seems to do the job.
Looks enough clean to me ;-) > The > only issue I see is if we *WANT* to keep the directories ( binutils? ) > then this method will fail. The books do not keep any directories > hanging around between passes or phases do they? I don't see an issue. IMHO, the flow is: We keep the directories after a suscefful build of the package. That new function remove it when resumming make after a failed build of the package. If the new build is suscessfull, the directories are retained until be used. Some next fail/resume don't will delete the keeped directories due that don't mach the new failed package name. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
