El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 15:34, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> What I can't get right is the $name-$version part. I'm playing with
> the dump-commands.xsl stylesheet in the LFS repo since it's simpler
> than lfs.xsl in jhalfs. It seems like the place you would want to have
> this to work easily with the rest of the stylesheet is to have them be
> child elements (or attributes) of <sect1>.
>
> <sect1>
> <package name="glibc" version="&glibc-version;"/>
> ...
> </sect1>
A "proper" syntax could be:
<sect1>
<sect1info>
<productname>glibc</productname>
<productnumber>&glibc-version;</productnumber>
</sect1info>
But I don't like it.
> Is there a better way this could be done? Also, are there any limits
> to what can be placed in a processing instruction? Is there any reason
> we couldn't define our own custom pi?
>
> <?package glibc &glibc-version;?>
Creating a PI is a more elegant solution, IMHO. PIs can be placed anywhere and
are ignored by default by the XML/XSL processors. They are parsed only if
there is a stylesheet that explicity matches it.
Another beast is to create such stylesheet. If you can't do it, I will try to
play with this night or tomorrow.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
