El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 20:00, Dan Nicholson escribió: > > The problem is that the entities aren't resolved within the PIs, so it > just comes out as &glibc-version;. >
Oh, yes, that's a PITA. > Another option I thought of was to use a custom DTD for <sect1> by > just overloading the standard DocBook one with a local one. But I'd > prefer not to do that since it adds potential for errors in the local > sect1 definition. When the sources will be migrated to Relax-NG such type of schema customizations will be very more easy to do. For now, looks that the <sect1info> way is the most semantically proper one. The issue is that when using DocBook-5 all <*info> tags must be replaced by plain <info>. Plus, we should to use <sect1info condition="script"> to be sure that it's not rendered on the HTML or PDF outputs. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
