Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 02/10/2013 23:26, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Le 02/10/2013 18:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >>>> In reviewing the logs and report after a jhalfs run, I do not see >>>> anywhere the versions of packages that have been built. The versions >>>> are embedded in the Makefile in calls to remove_existing_dirs and >>>> unpack, but that's a little cumbersome. >>>> >>>> I'd like to see the package version listed in three places: >>>> >>>> package log >>>> test log >>>> sbu report > [...] >> I was thinking about the published report as much as anything. But the >> other locations would be useful at times. >> >> -- Bruce >> > > I've had more time to think of it, it might not be so hard after all. > > There are 2 possibilities for the logs: > > - have a line "Version: xxx" in the file > - have the version appear in the file name. > > What would suit you best?
I was thinking of the file name. For example: 035-glibc-2.18 or 033-gcc-pass1-4.8.1. Actually 033-gcc-4.8.1-pass1 makes slightly more sense, but that's not critical. > For the test logs, it might be a little more work, but doable. > > Once it is in the logs (either in the title or in the file), it is just a > matter > of adding a couple of lines to the "create-sbu_du-report.sh" script. > > I'll work on it tomorrow. That would be great. Thanks. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
