97!! in whatever sequene rule, it can not print 97............. probably you want to say 27 :))
On Sep 23, 4:59 pm, Kunal Yadav <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 dave > Its giving 97 in my compiler. > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, vishwa <[email protected]> wrote: > > its 21 . > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:10 PM, vijay singh > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Think it as following... > >> (++i + ++i) + ++i; > >> i.e. > >> (7 + 7) + 8; > > >> 1) calculate ++i i.e i=6 > >> 2) calculate ++i i.e i=7 > >> 3) calculate (i + i) i.e (7+7) = 14 because i is now 7 > >> 4) calculate ++i i.e i=8 > >> 5) calculate 14 + i i.e 22 > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > -- > Regards > Kunal Yadav > (http:/sourcebit.in/ <http://algoritmus.in>) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
