@atul in case you are considering indexing from 1 then your for loop shud be *for(i=1.... *. Its more obvious this way that you are indexing from 1.....(Although doesn;t makes any difference to the overall objective)
Saurabh Singh B.Tech (Computer Science) MNNIT blog:geekinessthecoolway.blogspot.com On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:25 PM, atul anand <[email protected]> wrote: > @Lucifier : > > i wrote for (int i=0; i <= 9; ++i) because i was considering index from > 1 to n > not 0 to n-1; > > you are considering from 0 to n-1. so both are correct. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
