@saurabh: dats wat i said in my prev post... *both are correct* On 3 Jan 2012 19:16, "saurabh singh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> @atul in case you are considering indexing from 1 then your for loop shud > be *for(i=1.... *. > Its more obvious this way that you are indexing from 1.....(Although > doesn;t makes any difference to the overall objective) > > > Saurabh Singh > B.Tech (Computer Science) > MNNIT > blog:geekinessthecoolway.blogspot.com > > > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:25 PM, atul anand <[email protected]>wrote: > >> @Lucifier : >> >> i wrote for (int i=0; i <= 9; ++i) because i was considering index from >> 1 to n >> not 0 to n-1; >> >> you are considering from 0 to n-1. so both are correct. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
