To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70076
User douglasxnichols changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 13 17:44:59 +0000
2007 -------
No your example is wrong!
The point is you get several rows of january instead of on row with january and
a total. I am not talking about row headers I am talking about correctly
aggregating the data on the format- Month.
The point of the only using january is to point out how obsurd it would be to
want a table with a bunch of rows with January instead of one row with january.
You could see if you wanted to do a whole year??? You have to go through
obnoxious lengths to get the aggregation correctly.
You should be able to format the columns with month, quarter, etc and get a
aggregation table based on the format not the actual data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
