To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User gaute changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'andreschnabel,clytie,dano|'andreschnabel,axelb,clyti
|hnesorg,dnaber,dprina,erda|e,danohnesorg,dnaber,dprin
|lronahi,gaute,laurentgodar|a,erdalronahi,gaute,lauren
|d,pescetti,thing' |tgodard,pescetti,thing'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 12:34:29 +0000
2007 -------
I hesitated to add these comments to this issue, as it's a more radical
approach than "mere aggregation".
However, let me explain the basic idea: The main part of the code stays LGPL
like today, but is included into a larger GPL-ed program. It's possible for the
main code to stay LGPL-ed, because LGPL is GPL compatible. But it would now
also become possible to include additional GPL-ed components like dictionaries
(even if not considered "mere aggregation").
As for non-GPL libraries, I don't know. Is that still a problem when the main
part of the code remains LGPL?
(There are of course a number of GPL-compatible licenses which should pose no
problem. I don't think that's what you're talking about, though. http://
www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html )
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
